<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Paul&#8217;s is the First Campaign to Hijack for Publicity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.manchicken.com/2008/politics/ron-pauls-is-the-first-campaign-to-hijack-for-publicity.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.manchicken.com/2008/politics/ron-pauls-is-the-first-campaign-to-hijack-for-publicity.html</link>
	<description>Rantings of a Questionably Sane Chicken</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.manchicken.com/2008/politics/ron-pauls-is-the-first-campaign-to-hijack-for-publicity.html#comment-1285</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 20:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manchicken.com/2008/politics/ron-pauls-is-the-first-campaign-to-hijack-for-publicity.html#comment-1285</guid>
		<description>I know you don't like Ron Paul, but I think your article and Wired's article is slanted against him, implying that he had this in mind (which he may or may not have).

That said, I'm with you that he should denounce it. Though I don't think he would, he doesn't seem to have a history of doing that kind of thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know you don&#8217;t like Ron Paul, but I think your article and Wired&#8217;s article is slanted against him, implying that he had this in mind (which he may or may not have).</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m with you that he should denounce it. Though I don&#8217;t think he would, he doesn&#8217;t seem to have a history of doing that kind of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
