<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Are Conservatives Flocking to Huckabee?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.manchicken.com/2008/politics/why-are-conservatives-flocking-to-huckabee.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.manchicken.com/2008/politics/why-are-conservatives-flocking-to-huckabee.html</link>
	<description>Rantings of a Questionably Sane Chicken</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.manchicken.com/2008/politics/why-are-conservatives-flocking-to-huckabee.html/comment-page-1#comment-1332</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manchicken.com/2008/politics/why-are-conservatives-flocking-to-huckabee.html#comment-1332</guid>
		<description>&gt;The U.S. Constitution is not meant to be a
&gt;vehicle for ideological coercion.

Sure it is! Ideologies are not bad in and of themselves. Even the scientific method is itself an ideology. And &quot;coersion&quot; simply means that you force someone to do something regardless of how they feel about it. The thirteenth amendment, for example, quite firmly &quot;coerces&quot; an abolition ideology... no matter how I feel about it, I must comply with abolition (and rightly so!) By its very existence, the Constitution is a vehicle for &quot;ideological coercion&quot;... it is the sort of document that tells people what they can and cannot do.

But let&#039;s be careful to expand our definition of &quot;ideology&quot; to what it really means: a collection of ideas, a worldview. We&#039;ve all got one.

&gt;Are we really going to regress to a time
&gt;of the Spanish Inquisition again, is
&gt;that what Christian conservative
&gt;Republicans want?

I don&#039;t think anyone is advocating this.

&gt;Do we want homosexuals to have to hide
&gt;in fear?

Again, I don&#039;t think anyone is advocating this.

&gt;What’s next, forcing all citizens to
&gt;swear allegiance to this misguided
&gt;&quot;Christian Flag&quot; in class as well as the
&gt;U.S. flag?

I haven&#039;t heard this from anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;The U.S. Constitution is not meant to be a<br />
&gt;vehicle for ideological coercion.</p>
<p>Sure it is! Ideologies are not bad in and of themselves. Even the scientific method is itself an ideology. And &#8220;coersion&#8221; simply means that you force someone to do something regardless of how they feel about it. The thirteenth amendment, for example, quite firmly &#8220;coerces&#8221; an abolition ideology&#8230; no matter how I feel about it, I must comply with abolition (and rightly so!) By its very existence, the Constitution is a vehicle for &#8220;ideological coercion&#8221;&#8230; it is the sort of document that tells people what they can and cannot do.</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s be careful to expand our definition of &#8220;ideology&#8221; to what it really means: a collection of ideas, a worldview. We&#8217;ve all got one.</p>
<p>&gt;Are we really going to regress to a time<br />
&gt;of the Spanish Inquisition again, is<br />
&gt;that what Christian conservative<br />
&gt;Republicans want?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone is advocating this.</p>
<p>&gt;Do we want homosexuals to have to hide<br />
&gt;in fear?</p>
<p>Again, I don&#8217;t think anyone is advocating this.</p>
<p>&gt;What’s next, forcing all citizens to<br />
&gt;swear allegiance to this misguided<br />
&gt;&#8221;Christian Flag&#8221; in class as well as the<br />
&gt;U.S. flag?</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t heard this from anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eddie m.</title>
		<link>http://www.manchicken.com/2008/politics/why-are-conservatives-flocking-to-huckabee.html/comment-page-1#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator>eddie m.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manchicken.com/2008/politics/why-are-conservatives-flocking-to-huckabee.html#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>one point your last couple of paragraphs hint at, but dont express outright:

what in their christian agenda allows them to export the &#039;immigrants&#039; that are &#039;ruining&#039; the country, as the claim goes? What is theologically just in their attempts to create an isolationist state?

-eddie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one point your last couple of paragraphs hint at, but dont express outright:</p>
<p>what in their christian agenda allows them to export the &#8216;immigrants&#8217; that are &#8216;ruining&#8217; the country, as the claim goes? What is theologically just in their attempts to create an isolationist state?</p>
<p>-eddie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
